Black Trident wrote:
|
Then please answer my post about Allah's daughter. Let's see if you can give some counter points.
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
When we look at verse 53.21 & 53.22, there's no chastisement against the pagans for assigning children to Allah. It is only for assigning daughters, and not sons.
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
So the two verses don't say anything about Allah not having daughters. They're just claiming that assigning ONLY daughters to Allah is unfair, where-else the pagans themselves would love to have sons.
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
Look closer at verse 53.21. It refers to Allah in the third person i.e. "Him". So obviously it was NOT Allah who spoke this verse.
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
If not, then who? Gabriel? Muhammad?
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
Why are they talking about Allah's daughter?
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
Have the person, who is revealing this verse, seen them before?
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
There doesn't seem to be a smooth flow throughout these verses.
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
The verse 53:23 says the names mentioned in the previous verses are due to the pagan's imagination only.
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
But the previous verses don't say anything to this effect. It only says that assigning ONLY daughters to Allah is most unfair, where-else the pagans would love to have sons.
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
So the tone of the verses is like "It is not fair that you assign only daughters to Allah. It's only fair that He too must have sons.
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
" This is something nobody can deny.
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
Then all of a sudden in verse 53:23, Allah makes an about turn & declares that such names are purely imagined.
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
Now, why didn't he say so in the verses before 53:23?
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
Why does he needs to sound so envious i.e. because He was assigned ONLY daughters, and NOT sons?
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
Why can't Allah just says in a straightforward manner that "These names are imagined"?
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
If He did so, nobody will be confused by verses 53:19 to 53:22.
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
Now I have more confidence that the "Satanic Verses" incident took place between verses 53:22 & 53:23. There are simply no other ways to explain Allah's jealousy about "Not being assigned sons, but ONLY daughters. If Laat, Manat & Uzza are indeed imaginations of the pagans, then why did Allah had to sound so envious in verses 53:21 & 53:22? It simply doesn't makes sense at all.
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
Like always, the Muslims like to skirt around the actual issue rather than face the reality.
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
Since it has been proven that the deity Allah indeed had daughters,
|
Black Trident wrote:
|
the Muslims feel defeated and now attack people's credibility. It's a diversionary tactic.
|