You are missing our excellent site navigation system. Register here for free and get full operational site navigation system. Benefits of full navigation system: Additional items in "home" menu for registered users, shortcuts to your account managements, quick-shortcut links to download and forum sections, show staffs and members online, notify you for new private messages and shortcut to individual messages grouped by senders, tracking latest forum posts since your last visits and reads, and much more.  
 User:  Pwd:
 

Free-Islam.com Free-Islam.com
::  Home  ::  Access Quran Project  ::  Free Islam Quran Translation  ::  Account  ::  Inbox  ::  Forums  ::  Downloads  ::  MP3 Player  ::  Video  ::  Arcade  ::  Chess  ::  Guest Book  ::
www.free-islam.com :: View topic - Ahmed, Your posts on FFI
www.free-islam.com Forum Index Search Forum FAQ Memberlist Ranks Statistics Usergroups
View Favorites Sudoku Coloku Lexoku Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in
Information Ahmed, Your posts on FFI

Post new topic Reply to topic
www.free-islam.com Forum Index » Hadith & Sunnah  Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20  Next 
View previous topic :: View next topic
AuthorMessage
BMZ
Moderator
Moderator


Status:
Age: 68
Faith: Islam
Gender:Gender:Male
Zodiac: Libra
Joined: Jun 12, 2007

Posts: 614

singapore.gif

Post subject: Ahmed, Your posts on FFI Reply with quote  

I do not write at FFI anymore but sometimes I just read to see what the various goons are writing and I noticed you were talking to a few goons on Tayammum.

Here is something very interesting from the First Prophet of Ex-Muslim Kafirs, Ibn Warraq, another paralysed Kafir mind. In his book "Why I Am Not a Muslim", he wrote about the Tayammum carried out by the Jews:

Quote:
The Thalmud tells that he who "cleanses himself with sand has then done enough"


Ask the FFI goons to have a talk with ygalg and other Jews. Jesus freaks have nothing on the Laws except a book which they do not really subscribe to. Next the goons at FFI will ask how to rub sand all over their face and the body? lol!

I don't think sensible Western readers appreciate the gibberish and nonsense from these closet-apostates. It is the so-called idiotic ex-Muslim fakes who indulge in the garbage written.

What this goon Ibn Warraq does not know is that Jesus did not bring anything new, had nothing new to offer and he gave no Scripture. The Laws were the same, only they had to be enforced again, as Christianity had pissed over the Laws.
Roflmao

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2309627/Why-I-Am-Not-a-Muslim-by-Ibn-Warraq

Salaams, mate

BMZ
Post Posted:
Thu 23 Apr, 2009 3:21 pm
Top of PageView user's profileSend private message
AhmedBahgat
Site Admin
Site Admin


Status:
Age: 51
Faith: Islam
Gender:Gender:Male
Zodiac: Leo
Joined: Oct 16, 2006

Posts: 3228
Location: Australia
australia.gif

Post subject: Re: Ahmed, Your posts on FFI Reply with quote  

BMZ wrote:
I do not write at FFI anymore but sometimes I just read to see what the various goons are writing and I noticed you were talking to a few goons on Tayammum.

Here is something very interesting from the First Prophet of Ex-Muslim Kafirs, Ibn Warraq, another paralysed Kafir mind. In his book "Why I Am Not a Muslim", he wrote about the Tayammum carried out by the Jews:

Quote:
The Thalmud tells that he who "cleanses himself with sand has then done enough"


Ask the FFI goons to have a talk with ygalg and other Jews. Jesus freaks have nothing on the Laws except a book which they do not really subscribe to. Next the goons at FFI will ask how to rub sand all over their face and the body? lol!

I don't think sensible Western readers appreciate the gibberish and nonsense from these closet-apostates. It is the so-called idiotic ex-Muslim fakes who indulge in the garbage written.

What this goon Ibn Warraq does not know is that Jesus did not bring anything new, had nothing new to offer and he gave no Scripture. The Laws were the same, only they had to be enforced again, as Christianity had pissed over the Laws.
Roflmao

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2309627/Why-I-Am-Not-a-Muslim-by-Ibn-Warraq

Salaams, mate

BMZ


Thanks mate for this valuable information, I will make a copy of it on FFI and see if any of the goons has a reply to it

Cheers

_________________
http://free-islam.com
Post Posted:
Thu 23 Apr, 2009 11:22 pm
Top of PageView user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
BMZ
Moderator
Moderator


Status:
Age: 68
Faith: Islam
Gender:Gender:Male
Zodiac: Libra
Joined: Jun 12, 2007

Posts: 614

singapore.gif

Post subject: Re: Ahmed, Your posts on FFI Reply with quote  

AhmedBahgat wrote:
BMZ wrote:
I do not write at FFI anymore but sometimes I just read to see what the various goons are writing and I noticed you were talking to a few goons on Tayammum.

Here is something very interesting from the First Prophet of Ex-Muslim Kafirs, Ibn Warraq, another paralysed Kafir mind. In his book "Why I Am Not a Muslim", he wrote about the Tayammum carried out by the Jews:

Quote:
The Thalmud tells that he who "cleanses himself with sand has then done enough"


Ask the FFI goons to have a talk with ygalg and other Jews. Jesus freaks have nothing on the Laws except a book which they do not really subscribe to. Next the goons at FFI will ask how to rub sand all over their face and the body? lol!

I don't think sensible Western readers appreciate the gibberish and nonsense from these closet-apostates. It is the so-called idiotic ex-Muslim fakes who indulge in the garbage written.

What this goon Ibn Warraq does not know is that Jesus did not bring anything new, had nothing new to offer and he gave no Scripture. The Laws were the same, only they had to be enforced again, as Christianity had pissed over the Laws.
Roflmao

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2309627/Why-I-Am-Not-a-Muslim-by-Ibn-Warraq

Salaams, mate

BMZ


Thanks mate for this valuable information, I will make a copy of it on FFI and see if any of the goons has a reply to it

Cheers


Once you write, then check out how the notorious paralysed minds put another spin. lol!

Are the paralysed Kafir minds back home? Laughing

Salaams
BMZ
Post Posted:
Thu 23 Apr, 2009 11:50 pm
Top of PageView user's profileSend private message
AhmedBahgat
Site Admin
Site Admin


Status:
Age: 51
Faith: Islam
Gender:Gender:Male
Zodiac: Leo
Joined: Oct 16, 2006

Posts: 3228
Location: Australia
australia.gif

Post subject: Re: Ahmed, Your posts on FFI Reply with quote  

BMZ wrote:
Once you write, then check out how the notorious paralysed minds put another spin. lol!

Are the paralysed Kafir minds back home? Laughing

Salaams
BMZ


Done

cheers

_________________
http://free-islam.com
Post Posted:
Fri 24 Apr, 2009 12:08 am
Top of PageView user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
BMZ
Moderator
Moderator


Status:
Age: 68
Faith: Islam
Gender:Gender:Male
Zodiac: Libra
Joined: Jun 12, 2007

Posts: 614

singapore.gif

Post subject: Re: Ahmed, Your posts on FFI Reply with quote  

AhmedBahgat wrote:
BMZ wrote:
Once you write, then check out how the notorious paralysed minds put another spin. lol!

Are the paralysed Kafir minds back home? Laughing

Salaams
BMZ


Done

cheers


Will take a look at the spinning by the goons.

Salaams & Good night
BMZ
Post Posted:
Fri 24 Apr, 2009 12:55 am
Top of PageView user's profileSend private message
BMZ
Moderator
Moderator


Status:
Age: 68
Faith: Islam
Gender:Gender:Male
Zodiac: Libra
Joined: Jun 12, 2007

Posts: 614

singapore.gif

Post subject: Re: Ahmed, Your posts on FFI Reply with quote  

BMZ wrote:
AhmedBahgat wrote:
BMZ wrote:
Once you write, then check out how the notorious paralysed minds put another spin. lol!

Are the paralysed Kafir minds back home? Laughing

Salaams
BMZ


Done

cheers


Will take a look at the spinning by the goons.

Salaams & Good night
BMZ


Oh! You posted the whole thing! lol

Anyway, I burst into laughter after I read this from charleslemartel:

Quote:
You can see for yourself why skynightblaze and others consider him nothing more than a troll. His post contains nothing but tu quoque. How does what he says defend the stupidity? It only seeks to prove that others were stupid too; but so what?


Ahmed, this is why I brought up the topic, "The Paralysis of the Kafir Mind" at COEM but the closed minds could not understand. Laughing

You see how off-topic did charleslemartel go? Instead of trying to comprehend, Charles talks about another goon.

I don't think my dear lizard yeezewee had anything to offer as it seems he understood nothing. Is he a Chinese mind?

I really don't know how can you stand these FFI goons. You are great, mate.

BMZ
Post Posted:
Fri 24 Apr, 2009 1:11 am
Top of PageView user's profileSend private message
BMZ
Moderator
Moderator


Status:
Age: 68
Faith: Islam
Gender:Gender:Male
Zodiac: Libra
Joined: Jun 12, 2007

Posts: 614

singapore.gif

Post subject: Reply with quote  

And the hilarious response from FFI's junior school troll skynightblaze.


Re: Exposing a hadith worshipper (Neveen Salah Labib) Facebook

Postby skynightblaze �??????�?????�????�???�??�?�» Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:29 pm

Debunker wrote:Tayammum is just a "symbolic" ritual to take place of actual Wudu when water is hard to come by. Tayammum is the simple act of wiping "dry sand" on the face and two hands only....As I said it's only a symbolic ritual.



skynightTroll: "What do you mean by symbolic ritual? Do you mean you are not supposed to actually use soil? I dont think so . The verse is very clear and it says you are supposed to use soil . I think using soil will make me more filthy than I was before using soil.
Quran gives you a substitute for water but thats a bad substitute."

Debunker wrote:And women are not filthy. Sexual intercourse (with women) requires ritualisitic bathing for both the man AND the woman. (This is "stolen" from the Bible by the way). The phrase "if you touch women" means if you have sexual intercourse. Even in today's language touching a woman refers to having sexual intercourse... didn't you know that already?



skynightblazeTroll: "Agreed but quran doesnt say so that women are supposed to clean themself too.ITs from the hadiths that we get this idea.The verse 5:6 or 4:43 is an instruction to men and not women.IS there any verse besides this that conveys the idea that women are supposed clean themselves after sex? Why only men are asked to clean creates a doubt."



Debunker wrote:And somewhere in this forum someone claims that women are treated like dirt in the Quran when they are menstruating. The fact is when a woman is menstruating NOTHING changes except for two things: 1- No sexual intercourse 2- The woman doesn't have to pray nor fast while she's menstruating. That's it. This is also "stolen" from the Bible with A LOT of modifications, because in the Bible, a woman is treated like a highly contagious leper as long as she's menstruating, and NOT only that, her menstruating is considered a SIN she has to atone for by burning a bird!
Leviticus 15:19-30
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se ... version=31



skynightblazeTroll: "Well I aint a christian so there is no point in showing me what bible says. Anyway this is the reason why I find islam hollow. Practically what matters during prayer is your devotion and sincerity.Its totally mental and hence physical characteristics like menstruation shoudnt be a factor to decide whether to pray or not. I find it cheap that GOD is so focused on physical characteristics than on the spiritual. Women is isolated because she is considered as unclean even when there is no fault of her. Thats insulting to a woman.

I find this weird that GOD considers menstruating women as unclean when he himself is the cause of that. GOD likes cleanliness but still causes women to menustruate which is unclean according to him.Why create unclean things when you hate them so much?

I have another question for you. When you know that quran stole it from bible why do you still want to be a muslim?"

Everyone can see how FFI Trolls have been brought up among the group of the the paralysed Kafir minds, who cannot use their brains to think.

I think their job is only to troll and disrupt discussions. This particular troll skynightblaze will think that people will have buckets of sand and will shower under sand. Rofl. This Troll skynightblaze's insanity knows no bounds.

Mate, these goons are hilarious.

Salaams, mate
BMZ


Last edited by BMZ on Sat 09 May, 2009 4:24 pm; edited 1 time in total
Post Posted:
Fri 24 Apr, 2009 2:57 am
Top of PageView user's profileSend private message
BMZ
Moderator
Moderator


Status:
Age: 68
Faith: Islam
Gender:Gender:Male
Zodiac: Libra
Joined: Jun 12, 2007

Posts: 614

singapore.gif

Post subject: Silly FF Goons Reply with quote  

Hello, Ahmed

I read the topic about 16:126 in the Qur'aan and Hadith topic.

The birdbrains at FFI do not understand at all the topic discussed in a particular section of Qur'aan.

The assholes quote a single verse to discuss issues and even an FFI poster with a single brain cell should understand that the verse 16:126 should be read along with 16:125. Only then the paralysed Kafir minds would be able to understand the message.

16:125

ادع الى سبيل ربك بالحكمة والموعظة الحسنة وجادلهم بالتي هي احسن ان ربك هو اعلم بمن ضل
عن سبيله وهو اعلم بالمهتدين

16:126
وان عاقبتم فعاقبوا بمثل ماعوقبتم به ولئن صبرتم لهو خير للصابرين

The topic in above is clearly taking about inviting the paralysed Kafir minds and sickos, including other assholes, to argue and discuss in the best possible way.

This is exactly what we did at the FFI Cesspool. Now when the FFI Kafir asshole is unable to argue, he/she starts pouring filth and shitting from the wrong hole.

The verse encourages Muslims to be patient and polite in exchanges, discussions and debates. However, if the sick Kafir birdbrain keeps on attacking, then the Muslims have ther right to attack the assholes in any language they deem fit.

For example, I try to be nice, polite and courteous in my exchanges with most of FFI scumbags but you screw and grill the buggers. In this case, you are doing perfectly okay.

You may post this on FFI, if you like, in order to let all the FFI punks and goons to learn something and please tell the Sub-Continental arsehole skynightablaze and the Pissed-out-cohot to at least learn how to read an English translation of Qur'aan in order.

Thus according to 16:125-126, we are doing a great job. Also, tell the FFI goons to read Asad's translation of the verses:

Quote:
16:125 CALL THOU (all mankind] unto thy Sustainer's path with wisdom and goodly exhortation, and argue with them in the most kindly manner-49 for, behold, thy Sustainer knows best as to who strays from His path, and best knows He as to who are the right-guided. 16:126 Hence, if you have to respond to an attack (in argument], respond only to the extent of the attack levelled against you;'-" but to bear yourselves with patience is indeed far better for (you, since God is with] those who are patient in adversity.


Hope the birdbrains and the nosehair skynightblaze will understand it better.

Salaams, mate
BMZ
Post Posted:
Sat 25 Apr, 2009 2:55 pm
Top of PageView user's profileSend private message
BMZ
Moderator
Moderator


Status:
Age: 68
Faith: Islam
Gender:Gender:Male
Zodiac: Libra
Joined: Jun 12, 2007

Posts: 614

singapore.gif

Post subject: A Female Goon AT FFI Reply with quote  

Hello, Ahmed

There is a female goon at FFI and she goes by the nick sunshine and her hilarious signature reads:

Quote:
"Humiliate the non-Muslims to such an extent that they surrender and pay tribute." (Repentance, IX: 29)


Could you please check with sunshine where did she get that idiotic translation from? FFI's Wikiislam? Must be from some FFI lead goon. lol

Salaams, mate
BMZ
Post Posted:
Mon 27 Apr, 2009 1:49 am
Top of PageView user's profileSend private message
AhmedBahgat
Site Admin
Site Admin


Status:
Age: 51
Faith: Islam
Gender:Gender:Male
Zodiac: Leo
Joined: Oct 16, 2006

Posts: 3228
Location: Australia
australia.gif

Post subject: Reply with quote  

Salam all

All Muslims on this web site should have realized by now that this piece of trailer trash named debunker, is nothing but a cheat who works for the kafirs on FFI, possibly he is one of them but multilinking

This must prove the desperation of the kafirs on FFI, resorting to such cheap tactics by bringing a whore from them to pretend to be a Muslim,

Let�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??s see what that whore said to Khalil:

The filthy cheat debonked aka debunker wrote:
I don't know why you're still arguing this with them?! Sex with slaves IMPLIES forced sex if they refused, since by definition, a slave has no rights. Period!


See how the filthy cheat debunker is referring to the Muslims as �?????�????�???�??�?�¢??THEM�?????�????�???�??�?�¢?�?????�????�???�??�?�. This clearly means that he is not one of us (Muslims), how dumb he was exposing his cheating arse that easy, his stupidity did not stop there see what he said next:

The filthy tard of a cheat debunker said:

Sex with slaves IMPLIES forced sex if they refused, since by definition, a slave has no rights. Period!

Well, the Quran exposes such freak big times, because the Quran clearly told us that to marry from those Ma Malakat Aymanikum we must take the permission of their parents, let�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??s have a look:

And whoever among you who can afford to marry the protected and believing women, then (marry) of those whom your oaths possess from among your believing young women; and Allah knows best your oaths between some of you and others; so marry them with the permission of their families, and give them their dowries in kindness if they are seeking protection, not fornicating, nor receiving paramours if they protected themselves, and if they commit an indecency, then on them is half the suffering which should be upon the protected women. This is for him who fears the sin from among you; and if you are patient is better for you, and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

[The Quran ; 4:25]

ومن لم يستطع منكم طولا ان ينكح المحصنات المؤمنات فمن ما ملكت ايمانكم من فتياتكم المؤمنات والله اعلم بايمانكم بعضكم من بعض فانكحوهن باذن اهلهن واتوهن اجورهن بالمعروف محصنات غير مسافحات ولا متخذات اخدان فاذا احصن فان اتين بفاحشة فعليهن نصف ما علي المحصنات من العذاب ذلك لمن خشي العنت منكم وان تصبروا خير لكم والله غفور رحيم

-> See how the verse above is clearly telling the Muslims who cannot afford marrying from the well supported women: ومن لم يستطع منكم طولا ان ينكح المحصنات المؤمنات فمن ما ملكت ايمانكم من فتياتكم المؤمنات , i.e. And whoever among you who can afford to marry the protected and believing women, then (marry) of those whom your oaths possess from among your believing young women , see what is said next confirms that the word Aymanikum means YOUR OATHS: والله اعلم بايمانكم بعضكم من بعض , i.e. and Allah knows best your oaths between some of you and others; , i.e. an oath was taken to care for some of those poor humans that even their families cannot support them, see what was the condition to marry from them as stated next: فانكحوهن باذن اهلهن واتوهن اجورهن بالمعروف محصنات غير مسافحات , i.e. so marry them with the permission of their families, and give them their dowries in kindness if they are seeking protection, not fornicating, , HOW CLEAR, so if according to such fake and cheat of a deceiver debunker, that they have no right, then how come the men can only marry them after taking the permission of their parents? See how the Quran also commands those Ma Malakat Aymanikum too seek marriage and not fornication. Which means in no way the Quran allow their masters to force them into fornication by getting raped

That should expose the lying, filthy, tard, fake and cheat debunker

_________________
http://free-islam.com
Post Posted:
Mon 27 Apr, 2009 9:52 pm
Top of PageView user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
BMZ
Moderator
Moderator


Status:
Age: 68
Faith: Islam
Gender:Gender:Male
Zodiac: Libra
Joined: Jun 12, 2007

Posts: 614

singapore.gif

Post subject: Reply with quote  

AhmedBahgat wrote:
Salam all

All Muslims on this web site should have realized by now that this piece of trailer trash named debunker, is nothing but a cheat who works for the kafirs on FFI, possibly he is one of them but multilinking

This must prove the desperation of the kafirs on FFI, resorting to such cheap tactics by bringing a whore from them to pretend to be a Muslim,

Let�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??s see what that whore said to Khalil:

The filthy cheat debonked aka debunker wrote:
I don't know why you're still arguing this with them?! Sex with slaves IMPLIES forced sex if they refused, since by definition, a slave has no rights. Period!


See how the filthy cheat debunker is referring to the Muslims as �?????�????�???�??�?�¢??THEM�?????�????�???�??�?�¢?�?????�????�???�??�?�. This clearly means that he is not one of us (Muslims), how dumb he was exposing his cheating arse that easy, his stupidity did not stop there see what he said next:

The filthy tard of a cheat debunker said:

Sex with slaves IMPLIES forced sex if they refused, since by definition, a slave has no rights. Period!

Well, the Quran exposes such freak big times, because the Quran clearly told us that to marry from those Ma Malakat Aymanikum we must take the permission of their parents, let�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??s have a look:

And whoever among you who can afford to marry the protected and believing women, then (marry) of those whom your oaths possess from among your believing young women; and Allah knows best your oaths between some of you and others; so marry them with the permission of their families, and give them their dowries in kindness if they are seeking protection, not fornicating, nor receiving paramours if they protected themselves, and if they commit an indecency, then on them is half the suffering which should be upon the protected women. This is for him who fears the sin from among you; and if you are patient is better for you, and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

[The Quran ; 4:25]

ومن لم يستطع منكم طولا ان ينكح المحصنات المؤمنات فمن ما ملكت ايمانكم من فتياتكم المؤمنات والله اعلم بايمانكم بعضكم من بعض فانكحوهن باذن اهلهن واتوهن اجورهن بالمعروف محصنات غير مسافحات ولا متخذات اخدان فاذا احصن فان اتين بفاحشة فعليهن نصف ما علي المحصنات من العذاب ذلك لمن خشي العنت منكم وان تصبروا خير لكم والله غفور رحيم

-> See how the verse above is clearly telling the Muslims who cannot afford marrying from the well supported women: ومن لم يستطع منكم طولا ان ينكح المحصنات المؤمنات فمن ما ملكت ايمانكم من فتياتكم المؤمنات , i.e. And whoever among you who can afford to marry the protected and believing women, then (marry) of those whom your oaths possess from among your believing young women , see what is said next confirms that the word Aymanikum means YOUR OATHS: والله اعلم بايمانكم بعضكم من بعض , i.e. and Allah knows best your oaths between some of you and others; , i.e. an oath was taken to care for some of those poor humans that even their families cannot support them, see what was the condition to marry from them as stated next: فانكحوهن باذن اهلهن واتوهن اجورهن بالمعروف محصنات غير مسافحات , i.e. so marry them with the permission of their families, and give them their dowries in kindness if they are seeking protection, not fornicating, , HOW CLEAR, so if according to such fake and cheat of a deceiver debunker, that they have no right, then how come the men can only marry them after taking the permission of their parents? See how the Quran also commands those Ma Malakat Aymanikum too seek marriage and not fornication. Which means in no way the Quran allow their masters to force them into fornication by getting raped

That should expose the lying, filthy, tard, fake and cheat debunker


You are damn right, Ahmed. I suspected this poster debunker from day one he appeared.

The paralysed Kafir minds at FFI have lots of nicks and it is quite common to see multi-nicking carried out by FFI.

Please do not entertain suspect "Muslims" on FFI as most of them are as fake as the ex-Muslims there. lol!

Fudgy is genuine but this 'Muslim' goon is not.

I am glad you brought this up, mate.

Salaams
BMZ
Post Posted:
Mon 27 Apr, 2009 10:26 pm
Top of PageView user's profileSend private message
AhmedBahgat
Site Admin
Site Admin


Status:
Age: 51
Faith: Islam
Gender:Gender:Male
Zodiac: Leo
Joined: Oct 16, 2006

Posts: 3228
Location: Australia
australia.gif

Post subject: Reply with quote  

Salam all

It seems that the kafirs of FFI and their fellow cheat debonked, are too stupid to understand that my comment regarding 4:25 is irrefutable, let me do it with them in slow motion, perhaps their pinhead get it:

Here 1s 4:25 again:

And whoever among you who can afford to marry the protected and believing women, then (marry) of those whom your oaths possess from among your believing young women; and Allah knows best your oaths between some of you and others; so marry them with the permission of their families, and give them their dowries in kindness if they are seeking protection, not fornicating, nor receiving paramours if they protected themselves, and if they commit an indecency, then on them is half the suffering which should be upon the protected women. This is for him who fears the sin from among you; and if you are patient is better for you, and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

[The Quran ; 4:25]

ومن لم يستطع منكم طولا ان ينكح المحصنات المؤمنات فمن ما ملكت ايمانكم من فتياتكم المؤمنات والله اعلم بايمانكم بعضكم من بعض فانكحوهن باذن اهلهن واتوهن اجورهن بالمعروف محصنات غير مسافحات ولا متخذات اخدان فاذا احصن فان اتين بفاحشة فعليهن نصف ما علي المحصنات من العذاب ذلك لمن خشي العنت منكم وان تصبروا خير لكم والله غفور رحيم


The kafirs stupid argument is simply this: The words Ma Malakat Aymanikum mean: what your right hands possess, i.e. slaves

My argument is simply this: The words Ma Malakat Aymanikum mean: what your oaths possess, i.e. any poor human that is supported by another capable human who was bound by oath before Allah to support such poor human

4:25 CLEARLY PROVES MY ARGUMENT

See, after Allah told us to marry of Ma Malakat Aymanikum: فمن ما ملكت ايمانكم, i.e. then (marry) of those whom your oaths possess

He told us that: والله اعلم بايمانكم بعضكم من بعض, i.e. and Allah knows best your oaths between some of you and others

Now if you take the words Ma Malakat Aymanikum to mean what your right hands posses, then the second bit above can never make sense, because in that case it should mean: and Allah knows best your right hands between some of you and others

Therefore if the words Ma Malakat Aymanikum mean what your right hands possess, then the second part above should be:

And Allah knows best what your right hands possess between some of you and others

Which should be in Arabic as follow:

والله اعلم بما ملكت ايمانكم بعضكم من بعض

The underlined words NEVER APPEARED IN THE ARABIC WORDS

Therefore: Ma Malakat Aymanikum means: What your oaths posses, and in this case

The words والله اعلم بايمانكم بعضكم من بعض, should make 100% sense because it should emenas and Allah knows best your oaths between some of you and others

And that should slam dunk all the FFI kafirs and their fellow whore debunker


_________________
http://free-islam.com


Last edited by AhmedBahgat on Tue 28 Apr, 2009 10:21 am; edited 1 time in total
Post Posted:
Mon 27 Apr, 2009 11:12 pm
Top of PageView user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
BMZ
Moderator
Moderator


Status:
Age: 68
Faith: Islam
Gender:Gender:Male
Zodiac: Libra
Joined: Jun 12, 2007

Posts: 614

singapore.gif

Post subject: Reply with quote  

AhmedBahgat wrote:
Salam all

It seems that the kafirs of FFI and their fellow cheat debonked, are too stupid to understand that my comment regarding 4:25 is irrefutable, let me do it with them in slow motion, perhaps their pinhead get it:

Here 1s 4:25 again:

And whoever among you who can afford to marry the protected and believing women, then (marry) of those whom your oaths possess from among your believing young women; and Allah knows best your oaths between some of you and others; so marry them with the permission of their families, and give them their dowries in kindness if they are seeking protection, not fornicating, nor receiving paramours if they protected themselves, and if they commit an indecency, then on them is half the suffering which should be upon the protected women. This is for him who fears the sin from among you; and if you are patient is better for you, and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

[The Quran ; 4:25]

ومن لم يستطع منكم طولا ان ينكح المحصنات المؤمنات فمن ما ملكت ايمانكم من فتياتكم المؤمنات والله اعلم بايمانكم بعضكم من بعض فانكحوهن باذن اهلهن واتوهن اجورهن بالمعروف محصنات غير مسافحات ولا متخذات اخدان فاذا احصن فان اتين بفاحشة فعليهن نصف ما علي المحصنات من العذاب ذلك لمن خشي العنت منكم وان تصبروا خير لكم والله غفور رحيم


The kafirs stupid argument is simply this: The words Ma Malakat Aymanikum mean: what your right hands possess, i.e. slaves

My argument is simply this: The words Ma Malakat Aymanikum mean: what your oaths possess, i.e. any poor human that is supported by another capable human who was bound by oath before Allah to support such poor human

[size=150]4:25 CLEARLY PROVES MY ARGUMENT[/size]

See, after Allah told us to marry of Ma Malakat Aymanikum: فمن ما ملكت ايمانكم, i.e. then (marry) of those whom your oaths possess

He told us that: والله اعلم بايمانكم بعضكم من بعض, i.e. and Allah knows best your oaths between some of you and others

Now if you take the words Ma Malakat Aymanikum to mean what your right hands posses, then the second bit above can never make sense, because in that case it should mean: and Allah knows best your right hands between some of you and others

Therefore if the words Ma Malakat Aymanikum mean what your right hands possess, then the second part above should be:

And Allah knows best what your right hands possess between some of you and others

Which should be in Arabic as follow:

والله اعلم بما ملكت ايمانكم بعضكم من بعض

The underlined words NEVER APPEARED IN THE ARABIC WORDS

Therefore: Ma Malakat Aymanikum means: What your oaths posses, and in this case

The words والله اعلم بايمانكم بعضكم من بعض, should make 100% sense because it should mean and Allah knows best your oaths between some of you and others

And that should slam dunk all the FFI kafirs and their fellow whore debunker



That is exactly what the birdbrain Kafirs do not understand. Ma malakat aymanakum does not mean slave.

It is good that you can post on FFI. Good job, Ahmed. Keep on teaching the FFI goons.

I had to go back back into the dumb COEM today to take Rashna to task for the rubbish she wrote. Just for info of the readers here. I am in no mood to exchange with the goons at COEM.

It has become a fashion for Indian Hindus and Zorats to sit on ex-Muslims' site and write junk and rubbish, when their own religions are complete rubbish.

http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=5132.0

Salaams, mate
BMZ
Post Posted:
Tue 28 Apr, 2009 12:22 am
Top of PageView user's profileSend private message
AhmedBahgat
Site Admin
Site Admin


Status:
Age: 51
Faith: Islam
Gender:Gender:Male
Zodiac: Leo
Joined: Oct 16, 2006

Posts: 3228
Location: Australia
australia.gif

Post subject: Reply with quote  

Hey bro BMZ

see what the fool Khalil said to inmate Cassie, and see how I cornered his kafir arse:

KhaliL FarieL wrote:
Of course, but I am yet to understand how and what one's oath possesses. Laughing



That is how confused and manipulated you are

How about you explain to us how does a right hand possess a human?

Also how about you explain to us, why the right hand?, why not the left hand, and why not both hands?

That should corner you then send you back to the drawing board of your confusion table

_________________
http://free-islam.com
Post Posted:
Tue 28 Apr, 2009 10:23 am
Top of PageView user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
AhmedBahgat
Site Admin
Site Admin


Status:
Age: 51
Faith: Islam
Gender:Gender:Male
Zodiac: Leo
Joined: Oct 16, 2006

Posts: 3228
Location: Australia
australia.gif

Post subject: Reply with quote  

Hey goons

Let me totally demolish the confused and manipulated kafirs and their fellow traitor debonked

see what I wrote in my last comment to Khalil, for which I am certain he will dodge as he dodged so many tough arguments in the past

I asked him:

1) Why the right hand?
2) Why not the left hand?
3) Why not both hands?

Now if we think of the slaves as almost equivalent to the POWs, then the POWs should also be described as being possessed by the right hands. Let's have a look at the following verse which is talking about the POWs, and let's see if they are controlled by the right hand, or by the left hand or by both hands, obviously by both hands is the most logical:

O Prophet! Say to those who are in your hands from among the prisoners of war: If Allah knows good in your hearts, He will give you better than that which has been taken from you and will forgive you, and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

يأيها النبي قل لمن في ايديكم من الاسري ان يعلم الله في قلوبكم خيرا يؤتكم خيرا مما اخذ منكم ويغفر لكم والله غفور رحيم

[The Quran ; 8:70]

-> See you ignorant and confused FFI goons, Allah is telling us about the POWs: لمن في ايديكم من الاسري, Li Mn Fi AYDIKUM Min Al-Asra, i.e. who are in your hands from among the prisoners of war

I am sure the confused goons can see the slam coming

So if Ma Malakat Aymanikum means, what your right hands possess, how come the POWs were described as being controlled by both hands, let's see it again: لمن في ايديكم من الاسري, Li Mn Fi AYDIKUM Min Al-Asra, i.e. who are in your hands from among the prisoners of war

If the right hand is the expression to express owning, controlling, enslaving others, then shouldn't the verse above be saying:

لمن في ايمانكم من الاسري, Li Mn Fi AYMANIKUM Min Al-Asra, i.e. who are in your right hands from among the prisoners of war

Therefore, Ma Malakat Aymanikum MUST mean, What your oaths possess, which means that a capable human took an oath before Allah that he/she will care for and support any weak human.

What a mother of all slams


_________________
http://free-islam.com


Last edited by AhmedBahgat on Tue 28 Apr, 2009 5:01 pm; edited 1 time in total
Post Posted:
Tue 28 Apr, 2009 12:19 pm
Top of PageView user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Post new topic Reply to topic
www.free-islam.com Forum Index » Hadith & Sunnah Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20  Next 

 


Add To Favorites
Printable version
Jump to:  
Key
  You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Ported for PHP-Nuke by nukemods.com
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group :: Theme & Graphics by Daz
Powered by BonusNuke an extensivly modified PHP Nuke system.
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest ? 2005 by me.
You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php or ultramode.txt
PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2004 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
Page Generation: 0.34 Seconds
:: fiapple phpbb2 style by Daz :: PHPNuke theme by www.nukemods.com :: BonusNuke modified theme by www.bonusnuke.com ::
[ Script generation time: 0.349s (PHP: 96% - SQL: 4%) ] - [ SQL queries: 41 ] - [ Pages served in past 5 minutes : 97 ] - [ GZIP disabled ] - [ Debug on ]